Introduction:
CHI 2024 anticipates over 3,000 paper submissions. The review process must handle this volume while still offering high-quality reviews, which necessitates that each submission be handle by an experience Associate Chair (AC) which can recruit expert reviewers. The structuring of the CHI program panel chi 2024 subcommittees into topical subcommittees aids in this goal. A thorough explanation of the ACs’ and Subcommittee Chairs’ (SCs) roles may be found in the description in the Papers review procedure.
Authors should investigate what makes a contribution into CHI and know that there are numerous types of contributions that can be made to a CHI article.
Notes on Subcommittee Composition:
After abstracts have been sent in, individual subcommittees may expand or contract depending on the amount of likely papers for that subcommittee. As in past years, the newspaper’s chairs will conduct a survey to assess the diversity of each subcommittee. Please check, for example, this website’s article on the Diversity of the Organizing Committee for CHI 2020, posted in July 2019.
Authors are expect to come up with a panel of experts to review their contribution. This page gives information on how to select the proper subcommittees for your proposal.
Subcommittee Selection Process:
When submitting a Paper, you are able to choose up to one appropriate subcommittees, and we urge that you include two. In almost every case of circumstances, your submission will be review by one of all two subcommittees you specifie. If the Standing Committee Chairs and/or Panel Chairs determine that your application will be study more extensively in another subcommittee, it may be shift from one to another. If a submission gets sent to another subcommittee during the first weeks of the evaluation procedure, before reviewers are assign, it will not hinder the review chi 2024 subcommittees process; rather, it will guarantee that it obtains the most full and fair collection of evaluations.
Below is a list of groups and explanations of the issues they cover, as well as the names of each SC and the ACs who serve on them. It is your obligation to choose the subcommittee with the knowledge required to evaluate your research and who you believe will most appreciate your contributions to the field of HCI.
List of subcommittees:
A complete list of subcommittees is shown below.
Accessibility and aging:
This subcommittee welcomes contributions relating to the creation or study of technological tools for people with impairments and/or older adults. Accessibility papers are concern with technology create for or utilize by persons with impairments, such as sensory, motor, or mobility, psychosocial nor cognitive, intellectual, or learning problems, or those who identify as neurodiverse. Aging papers are roughly define as those that deal with technology create to or use by persons in their later phases of life. Relationships of technology are complicate and multidimensional; we invite submissions on a wide range of problems aim at benefit relevant stakeholder groups, not only concerns about making technology accessible. Note that if chi 2024 subcommittees your paper concentrates on health outcomes or as connections to health data or healthcare providers, the Health Sciences subcommittee is likely a better fit, though papers that reflect on how gadgets are implement or design for particular circumstances are more suite for this subcommittee.
Subcommittee Chairs:
Kristen Shinohara, University of Rochester of Technology (USA)
Mingming Fan, from the Hong Kong colleges of Sciences and Technologies in Guangzhou, China.
Stacy the research of Branham, the University of California, United States
Robin Brewer, the University of Michigan (USA)
Associate chairs:
Dragan Ahmetovic, University of Milan, Italy.
Giulia Barbareschi of Keio University, Japan
Erin Brady, Hoosier University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, USA
Danielle Bragg of Microsoft Research, USA
Erin Buehler, Google, United States
Patrick Carrington of the Carnegie Mellon University in the USA
Michael Crabb, College in Dundee (UK)
Jiamin (Carrie) Dai, College of British Columbia (Canada)
Shital Desai of York University, Alberta
Yao Du, who is College of Southern California (USA)
Yasmine N. Elglaly, Northern Washington University (USA)
Lizbeth Escobedo, a professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada
Vinitha Gadiraju, Wellesley, United States
Abraham Glasser of Gallaudet University, USA
Jiangtao Gong, Tsinghua University
Blending Interaction: Designing Interactive Systems and Tools:
This group focuses on the creation of new interactive systems as well as “enabling” contributions. Including resources that help to construct future interactivity systems and stimulate future interface design experiments. Interactive systems include a variety of technical components such as hardware, computer programs, human computation, and interface approaches. They will be evaluate base on how effectively they enable and exhibit unique interactive capabilities. “Enabling” contributions included historical data, tools, libraries, infrastructure, even languages. The contributions made will be evaluate base on how well they help the development, engineering, or evaluation of interactive systems, as well as how easily they can be share with the research community to create future interactive systems.
Visualization:
The Visualization subcommittee seeks articles on any aspect of visualizing data and visual analysis. This encompasses, but is not limit to, new representation or connection techniques/systems/technologies. Examinations of existing or unfamiliar visualization systems and techniques, research into important theories or information for the community. And lessons acquire through real-world designs and deployments. Submissions will be evaluate base on their contribution to visualization and their influence on HCI. For example, publications centered on technical advances must demonstrate how they connect to consumers and the user experience.
